[文集] [专题] [检索] [独立评论] [海阔天空] [矛盾江湖] [全版论坛]

独立评论

作者: 鸡头肉   这次众议院的争论中提到了“取消文化” 2021-01-13 14:24:51  [点击:6184]
俺在写较早的帖子时预估到,反对“取消文化”可能成为近期挺川者的辩论武器:

http://duping.net/XHC/show.php?bbs=11&post=1438479

果不其然,在下面视频的 1:23 处,共和党籍的议员 Jim Jordan 在众议院开侃“取消文化”的恐怖,试图通过渲染这种恐怖来反对弹劾/罢免川普总统:



… this is more than about impeaching the president of the united states; this is about canceling the president and canceling all the people you guys disagree with. That's what scares me more than anything. We have seen it play out over the past several days I never thought I'd see the things that we are now witnessing and I don't known where it ends. But I'll tell you what it should scare us all, and I said this in the judiciary committee, and the gentleman from Maryland will remember this. The cancel culture doesn't just go after conservatives and republicans. It won't just stop there. It'll come for us all. That's what's frightening and I hope, I hope you all recognize that. And at some point, at some point we can unite and actually do things that help those folks back home that we all get the privilege of representing...

Jordan 的话术其实并没有多大的说服力。事实上,取消文化的功能有点像工会,即把势单力薄的工人组织起来,抱团形成一股较强的力量来抗衡资源丰厚的资本家的压迫。正如工会组织的运动,“取消运动”能够和平存在的前提是其推动者和参加者基本守法,否则该运动将受到法律干预而难以为继。

作为推论,尽管在取消文化中可能会涌现出很多负面的东西,它们在“恶”的分量上是无法与法定的重罪相比的(否则人们就会立法给取消运动本身定罪名了)。如果有一架度量“恶”的程度的天平,俺们把取消文化搁在天平的一端,而把“总统违宪”放在天平的另一端,天平朝哪方倾斜是不言而喻的。

因此,以取消文化的坏处为借口来否决启动调查川普涉嫌违宪行为的程序,是说不过去的,明显犯了因小失大的错误。

与此类似,如果俺们比较推特对川普账号的“取消”之恶,和川普对国会大厦冲击事件的煽动之恶,天平的两端显然将朝着川普的煽动那一端倾斜。冲击事件导致多人死亡,这本来是可以避免的。这就是为什么需要在法律上对川普追责(包括启动弹劾),特推的封号相较之下是不足道的。
最后编辑时间: 2021-01-13 14:58:41

加跟贴

笔名:     新网友请先注册笔名 密码:
主题: 进文集
内容: