[文集] [专题] [检索] [独立评论] [海阔天空] [矛盾江湖] [全版论坛]

独立评论

所跟帖: 古迷 事实胜于雄辩   2011-09-03 10:12:33  


作者: 封从德   雄辯代替不了事實 2011-09-03 12:40:31  [点击:6783]
事實是西文論說"liberal nationalism"時,不大提到Berlin或Weber。你當然可以找到一兩個例外,但不能說明那是主流(樓上我的帖子已經詳加說明,在此不贅)。

而且,你大概也沒進去仔細讀,譬如在你給出的可憐的冷冷清清的搜尋結果中,就有這樣兩段:

Basing on discussing the theoretical possibility and complexity of “liberal nationalism" by examining Isaiah Berlin's reflection on nationalism,the author argues that there is tension between liberal pluralism and cultural nationalism in Berlin's thought, which is the reason why he failed to articulate a consistent set of normative theory of liberal nationalism.

Comparing Berlin with later liberal nationalists, we see that his liberalism prevented him from presenting a normative political theory in which liberal and nationalist commitments were successfully combined.
最后编辑时间: 2011-09-03 12:53:39

加跟贴

笔名:     新网友请先注册笔名 密码:
主题: 进文集
内容: